SBF is a sex forum, but no GAY threads?

[JWNY]

Let's conserve our marriage constitution as one between man and woman

I WRITE in response to Mr Janadas Devan's article, 'Can mum, mum and kids make a family?' (ST, July 7) and Dr George D. Bishop's letter, 'Special-needs kids thrive, thanks to mum and mum' (ST, July 11).

The main thrust of their letters are that lesbians and homosexuals can and are a normal family unit and can take care of children just as well as any other family unit and thus should be allowed to get married and be one.

The basic building block of society has always been the family which is defined as a married father and mother with children. Without strong family units, society will be fraught with problems. Our Prime Minister has rightly stated that the family unit is the core of our Singapore society.

Now homosexuals and lesbians want to redefine 'marriage' and 'family'. Why so? There is an inherent need for them to be accepted by society that their sexual behaviour is not abnormal but just a variation of normal sexual activity.

Do we want a Singapore where same-sex marriage prevails? If so, one might ask why not incorporate the following as diverse families.

1. two brothers;

2. two sisters

3. a brother and sister (case in German courts)

4. a man and a horse (film 'Zoo' shown in Sundance Film Festival - bestiality)

5. why not a combination of three or more?

6. why bother have a marriage or a family?

All these questions are not too remote; because those pursuing a perverted lifestyle must have the endorsement of society to secure their very identity, and the only way to achieve this is to go down the slippery road to establish that perversion is normal like incest is normal; bestiality is normal.

It is an issue of self-autonomy. Self is god. The point made is not academic but it has already happened and will continue to happen. This may be seen in the case of the four legislators in Massachusetts who followed up 'their success at legalising homosexual unions by pushing for softening laws against other forms of sexual deviance' including bestiality viz reducing the penalty to a fine (See First Comes Gay Marriage then comes Bestiality in Massachusetts http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/nov/05111703.html )

The four Democrat legislators 'are all vocal supporters of abortion, homosexual unions, and are all endorsed by all three of Massachusetts' gay lobby groups. Family lobbyists opposed to the re-definition of marriage were frequently ridiculed for their warnings that dissolving the natural basis of marriage in law would end with legalising and normalising a host of sexual perversions, including incest and bestiality. The case of the Massachusetts legislators is in point.

Following this, 'the media has quickly picked up on the trend of acceptance for any and all sorts of conditions that before the 1960's sexual revolution and the politicising of the psychiatric profession, were universally recognised as serious psychological disorders. New terminology has been established, calling those persons interested in having sexual relations with animals, 'zoophiles' or 'zoos' for short, and a campaign has been discretely under way for some time to reduce the public 'stigma' against 'zoos'.

We, in Singapore, want to conserve our marriage institution as one between a man and a woman so that the needs of our children for a father and a mother are catered for. We abhor any regression into perversity which, as history has shown, has led into the decline and fall of a society.

Dr Alan Chin Yew Liang

[sammyboyfor]

Originally Posted by JWNY

Let's conserve our marriage constitution as one between man and woman

This forum is for sex discussions. Sex occurs between two genders.

A man fucking another man's anal orifice is not sex!.. it's a perversion.

Anyone who starts a gay thread in this forum will be history in no time at all. I'll make sure of that.

[TommyPingPong]

Sorry, but I think SBF is best remain as it is. You tried look into Yahoo Classified Massage? You click a massage advert and you ended up "I am James, offering massage... " Yucks!

No offense to gays, but the forum should remain a straight sex site.

[tanhockgin]

Dear Sammyboy,

Interesting thread.

But there actually is a hidden gay forum in here. Its in the Tranny threads.

What do you consider members who you screw the ass of a ladyboy or trannies? Do they think they are girls? Or do they make themselves believe that the guys they are fucking are girls? And what about the guys who blow a tranny? Do they think the dick of a tranny is an elongated clit?

Such brothers are closeted gays; like it or not.

"Not that there's anything wrong with that." - Sienfeld

[Red_Tirak1099]

JWNY is a closet gay? Or a bisexual?

[WRX_STI]

Originally Posted by Red_Tirak1099

JWNY is a closet gay? Or a bisexual?

beter not remind him how he tio zap point by boss 4 start this thread coke man is straight lah not flat lol